> > I'm writing a port to PyConstructs. website of the original:
> > http://construct.wikispaces.com/
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> I decided to call it Data::ParseBinary. reasonable?
>>> I'm writing a port to PyConstructs. website of the original:
>>> http://construct.wikispaces.com/
>> I decided to call it Data::ParseBinary. reasonable?
> Sounds good. A rose by any other name, etc.
Well, Parse::Binary is already taken. There are actually a number of
binary struct parser on CPAN, just not quite the same... :-)
> Just mention that it was inspired by PyConstruct somewhere visible.
Of course.
> Note that Alan Haggai Alavi could really use it for his Archive::Zip work on
> this grant -
> http://news.perlfoundation.org/2008/05/2008q2_grant_proposal_fixing_b.html
> so releasing it as soon as possible would be prefarable.
Well, He should use the original Python version. That's because he is
using it as a point-of-reference, and it's better to use a well tested
package with known ZIP implementation, instead of a new package.
> Shlomi Fish (who wonders why so many discussions here have to be about "How
> should I name this module?")
Because it's a difficult question. (or obvious. depends) And it's the
right place to ask.
Shmuel.
Shlomi Fish - 13 Jul 2008 10:05 GMT
> >>> I'm writing a port to PyConstructs. website of the original:
> >>> http://construct.wikispaces.com/
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Well, Parse::Binary is already taken. There are actually a number of
> binary struct parser on CPAN, just not quite the same... :-)
I see. :-)
Maybe it will become as worse as Config::* ... or hopefully not.
> > Just mention that it was inspired by PyConstruct somewhere visible.
>
> Of course.
Cool.
> > Note that Alan Haggai Alavi could really use it for his Archive::Zip work
> > on this grant -
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> using it as a point-of-reference, and it's better to use a well tested
> package with known ZIP implementation, instead of a new package.
Last time I checked PyConstruct did not have any ZIP implementation. And using
your port will allow us to possibly use it inside the Archive::Zip test
suite.
> > Shlomi Fish (who wonders why so many discussions here have to be about
> > "How should I name this module?")
>
> Because it's a difficult question. (or obvious. depends) And it's the
> right place to ask.
OK. But like Shakespeare said "A Rose by any other name will smell just as
sweet.". But I guess it's OK.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish (who released Docmake whose distribution name is
http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-XML-DocBook-Builder/ to help avoid namespace
proliferation.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
Interview with Ben Collins-Sussman - http://xrl.us/bjn8s
I met a guy in the bar, talked to her and she gave me her phone number.
> > > http://construct.wikispaces.com/
>
> > In short, it's a library that parse binary structs.
Cool!
http://dev.perl.org/perl6/rfc/122.html