Very slow mail-transport to the list

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Robert Roggenbuck - 30 Jun 2009 14:02 GMT

During the last months I recogrise that Emails I sent to the list needing an
unusual long time to sent back to me - around 4 hours, sometimes some hours
more. But yesturday my mail needed more than 21 hours to reach the list (or at
least me). I sent it an 10:10 GMT and reached my today at 7:20 GMT! Is there
something wrong with the list software? Or is there a problem anywhere between
my and the list? Such delays are not good to take part in discussions...

Greetings

Robert

PS:

Here is a snipped of the mentioned Email. It can be seen that it left
Uni-Osnabrueck.DE at '29 Jun 2009 10:10:09 -0000' and was sent back to me from
lists.develooper.com at '30 Jun 2009 09:20:22 +0200':

From dbi-users-return-34090-rroggenb=mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de@perl.org Tue
Jun 30 09:20:31 2009
Return-Path: <dbi-users-return-34090-rroggenb=mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de@perl.org>
Received: from mail-in-7.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE
(sanode9eth0.rz.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE [131.173.17.149])
    by a21n11.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5U7KUKL001913
    for <rroggenb@uni-osnabrueck.de>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:20:31 +0200
Received: from mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (jin.mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE
[131.173.40.49])
    by mail-in-7.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
n5U7KTNN021551
    for <rroggenb@uni-osnabrueck.de>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:20:29 +0200
Received: from vm024.rz.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (vm024.rz.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE
[131.173.17.222])
    by mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n5U7KSGV009564
    for <rroggenb@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:20:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-in-1.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (vm058.rz.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE
[131.173.17.11])
    by vm024.rz.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5U7KN3k013230
    for <rroggenb@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:20:23 +0200
Received: from lists.develooper.com (x6.develooper.com [207.171.7.86])
    by mail-in-1.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id n5U7KL8e010935
    for <rroggenb@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:20:22 +0200
Received: (qmail 6494 invoked by uid 514); 30 Jun 2009 07:20:14 -0000
[snip]
Received: (qmail 32534 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2009 10:10:09 -0000
[snip]
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:09:54 +0200

Signature

======================================================
Robert Roggenbuck
Institut fuer wissenschaftliche Information e.V. (IWI)
Fachbereich Mathematik / Informatik
Universitaet Osnabrueck
Albrechtstr. 28a
49069 Osnabrueck
Germany
Tel ++49/541/969-2540 Fax -2770
rroggenb@uos.de
http://www.iwi-iuk.org
======================================================

Reply to this Message

cholet@logilune.com - 30 Jun 2009 16:19 GMT

Le 30 juin 09 à 15:02, Robert Roggenbuck a écrit :

> During the last months I recogrise that Emails I sent to the list
> needing an unusual long time to sent back to me - around 4 hours,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> software? Or is there a problem anywhere between my and the list?
> Such delays are not good to take part in discussions...

You are posting from an address different from the one subscribed to
the list, so your posts go through the moderator.

> Here is a snipped of the mentioned Email. It can be seen that it
> left Uni-Osnabrueck.DE at '29 Jun 2009 10:10:09 -0000' and was sent
> back to me from lists.develooper.com at '30 Jun 2009 09:20:22 +0200':

You didn't snip the interesting part:

Delivered-To: moderator for dbi-users@perl.org

--
Éric Cholet
perl.org list moderator

Reply to this Message

rroggenb@uni-osnabrueck.de - 01 Jul 2009 20:44 GMT

Thank You very much for this clarification! I will try to change my email
next week. The rest of this week I am at home and can not access the
address from wich I subscribed o the list. (Thats the reason for using the
wrong email even now.)

Regarding the snippets: I presented all lines conatining time information.
I am not so familiar with the mail-protocol to know taht other lines are
relevant too. Sorry for that and

Greetings

Robert

----

<zitiere wer="Éric Cholet">

> Le 30 juin 09 à 15:02, Robert Roggenbuck a écrit :
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Éric Cholet
> perl.org list moderator

Reply to this Message

Peter J. Holzer - 02 Jul 2009 11:43 GMT

> Regarding the snippets: I presented all lines conatining time information.
> I am not so familiar with the mail-protocol to know taht other lines are
> relevant too. Sorry for that and

That was my fault, sorry. I should have compared the headers from your
mail with other mails from the list. The mailing list software in use at
perl.org seems to remove all Received: headers from incoming mails. So
the headers you posted looked rather incomplete, but not because you
snipped too much but because the information wasn't there in the first
place.

hp

Signature

_ | Peter J. Holzer | Auf jedem Computer sollte der Satz Ludwigs II

__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Wolfram Heinrich in desd

Reply to this Message

Peter J. Holzer - 01 Jul 2009 08:24 GMT

> During the last months I recogrise that Emails I sent to the list needing
> an unusual long time to sent back to me - around 4 hours, sometimes some
> hours more. But yesturday my mail needed more than 21 hours to reach the
> list (or at least me). I sent it an 10:10 GMT and reached my today at
> 7:20 GMT! Is there something wrong with the list software? Or is there a
> problem anywhere between my and the list?

Éric already offered a plausible explanation, but ...

> From
> dbi-users-return-34090-rroggenb=mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de@perl.org
> Tue Jun 30 09:20:31 2009
> Return-Path: <dbi-users-return-34090-rroggenb=mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de@perl.org>

[several Received lines without significant delay]

> Received: from lists.develooper.com (x6.develooper.com [207.171.7.86])
> by mail-in-1.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id n5U7KL8e010935
> for <rroggenb@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:20:22 +0200
> Received: (qmail 6494 invoked by uid 514); 30 Jun 2009 07:20:14 -0000
> [snip]
> Received: (qmail 32534 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2009 10:10:09 -0000

The delay happens between these two Received lines. So you snipped
exactly the part where the problem can most likely be seen.

hp

Signature

_ | Peter J. Holzer | Auf jedem Computer sollte der Satz Ludwigs II

__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Wolfram Heinrich in desd

Reply to this Message

Webmaster Forum / Perl / DBI Library / July 2009

Very slow mail-transport to the list