> Im currently looking to move into using JSON for AJAX instead of
> returning from the server a string like the following:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Eval() I have heard can be quite slow? Is this a serious concern for
> large data sets?
I don't think so.
> Even if it is slow, is it still going to be faster than my previous
> method above?
Probably yes. eval() evaluates its string argument as an ECMAScript
Program. This evaluation is implemented in native, already compiled (with
few exceptions platform-dependent) code. That should be considerably faster
to execute than your implementation, which needs to be JIT-compiled and the
resulting byte-code interpreted by a VM first.
> I understand that you can have a JSON format for JS arrays and JS
> objects:
Just to add to confusion: JS arrays are implemented as objects, Array
objects. What you call "JS objects" here, are (augmented) Object objects.
> // array
> {0: 12345,2:"This is a text string"}
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I prefer objects because I dont need to specifiy the index key and I can
> treat it exactly like an array - oSet[0] = ...
The above is the reason for that. `0' is the name of either object's
property, only that the method of property access with Array objects differs
slightly from that of other objects.
> Are objects just as quick to access/alter as arrays?
I think they are quicker to alter than arrays when it comes to inserting
items, and just as quick when accessing items. To be sure, you could do an
estimation of general runtime efficiency on the corresponding algorithms in
the ECMAScript Specification, Edition 3 Final, and compare with empirical
results for different input.
> I have a few simultaneous client processes going on (ie. refreshing
> multiple HTML tables automatically in the background) and really want it
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> mainly just updating content on multiple tables and refreshing data every
> so often, thats about the extent of it.
When dealing with tables, you should consider a combination of both:
[
{x: 42, z: 23},
{x: 1337, z: 1701}
]
PointedEars
P.S.
Please don't use off-Usenetter slang like "coz" here. Besides presenting
you as a semi-literate, this is an international newsgroup.

Signature
Prototype.js was written by people who don't know javascript for people
who don't know javascript. People who don't know javascript are not
the best source of advice on designing systems that use javascript.
-- Richard Cornford, cljs, <f806at$ail$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk>