 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneralPHPASPPerlColdFusionFlashHTML, CSS, ScriptsBrowsers |
Webmaster Forum / HTML, CSS, Scripts / JavaScript / April 2007Opposite of JsMin?
I have a compressed/packed library that I am attempting to modernize. I would rather not have to convert it to a whitespace version by hand if possible. Any chance on something like an "uncompresser/unpacker" tool existing?  Signature-Lost Remove the extra words to reply by e-mail. Don't e-mail me. I am kidding. No I am not. > I have a compressed/packed library that I am attempting to modernize. I > would rather not have to convert it to a whitespace version by hand if > possible. > > Any chance on something like an "uncompresser/unpacker" tool existing? <URL: http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/tutorials/jsexamples/JSTidy.html> The code won't be in the same order. This program uses the browser's internal mechanics. I think I liked Opera the best for this. Peter >> I have a compressed/packed library that I am attempting to modernize. I >> would rather not have to convert it to a whitespace version by hand if [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > The code won't be in the same order. This program uses the browser's > internal mechanics. I think I liked Opera the best for this. Awesome, thanks! Weird results. obj.objFunc = function() { this.ref = this; } Firefox: obj.objFunc = (function () {this.ref = this;}); Opera: obj.objFunc = (function () { this.ref = this; } ); Oh well. It appears (really just venturing a guess) it cannot handle anonymous function addressing? Signature-Lost Remove the extra words to reply by e-mail. Don't e-mail me. I am kidding. No I am not. > >> I have a compressed/packed library that I am attempting to modernize. I > >> would rather not have to convert it to a whitespace version by hand if [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Oh well. It appears (really just venturing a guess) it cannot handle > anonymous function addressing? It is not weird that the two browsers produce different results. The JSTidy tool is using the browsers code.toString() function. (not that there really is a code.toString() function) Peter > I have a compressed/packed library that I am attempting to modernize. I > would rather not have to convert it to a whitespace version by hand if > possible. > > Any chance on something like an "uncompresser/unpacker" tool existing? i use this a lot for beautify the bookmarklets: http://elfz.laacz.lv/beautify/ >> I have a compressed/packed library that I am attempting to modernize. I >> would rather not have to convert it to a whitespace version by hand if [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > i use this a lot for beautify the bookmarklets: > http://elfz.laacz.lv/beautify/ Very nice! Thanks scripts.contact. It works *much* better than JSTidy. Signature-Lost Remove the extra words to reply by e-mail. Don't e-mail me. I am kidding. No I am not. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.