It's a gif... that's why. A gif can have only 256 colors in it. So to handle
more, a dithering algorithm is used. You can try messing with the gif output
options, but if you're going with gif you quality is going to degrade.
Really the only thing gif is good for is making small images out of text.
Why not just use swf?

Signature
Dave -
www.offroadfire.com
Head Developer
http://www.blurredistinction.com
Adobe Community Expert
http://www.adobe.com/communities/experts/
Thanks. I knew that about .gif files, but the thing is, i am getting ready to
launch an AD campaign online, and some sites only accept .gif files, also the
file sizes are limited to 50-80kb and .swf files are a lot bigger than
that...so that is why i was wondering if i can get a better quality image out
of a gif file. If you have any other suggestions, please let me know.
Thanks again.
-Yuri
DMennenoh **AdobeCommunityExpert** - 23 Jul 2008 19:25 GMT
50 - 80K is plenty of room for a .swf, you could do your example in less
than that easily, and it'll look better. Not that I'm into ad's too much,
but I've done my share and haven't seen a site that won't accept swf for a
little while. But good luck with .gif if you pursue it. You can google ways
to make it look better - similar color palette, etc.

Signature
Dave -
www.offroadfire.com
Head Developer
http://www.blurredistinction.com
Adobe Community Expert
http://www.adobe.com/communities/experts/
ynpavlov - 23 Jul 2008 20:29 GMT
Well, i guess i have another problem on my hands, how come all my .swf file is like 2.2MB for the banner that you saw?
aniebel - 26 Jul 2008 13:25 GMT
Are you placing your images at 100%? If you are importing images at a larger
size and reducing them, that could be a reason your SWF is so large. Also, you
can adjust the compression in its properties and that will bring down your
size.
On a side note, I have also experienced sites that only allow GIFs, which is
irritating. :)