
Signature
Terry, East Grinstead, UK
In comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html on Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:31:55
> I've just taken a look at some web pages I created several years ago,
> since when I've forgotten most of what little I knew about HTML
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> http://www.terrypin.dial.pipex.com/Walks/TP03/Photos03.htm
> which is how I want the other three to be.
All the pages look much alike to me. Considering that they were
apparently generated using FrontPage, they look remarkably good.
> No idea what can have happened to change these, but I'm hoping there's
> some relatively trivial explanation and fix. Otherwise I have a lot of
> re-learning to do before I can isolate it
> ;-)
What differences do you see between the pages? This is what I see:
<http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/tmp/photos03.png>
<http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/tmp/photos05.png>
What exactly do you want to change?

Signature
PJR :-)
slrn newsreader (v0.9.9): http://slrn.sourceforge.net/
extra slrn documentation: http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/
newsgroup name validator: http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator
Terry Pinnell - 28 Aug 2008 07:11 GMT
>In comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html on Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:31:55
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
>What exactly do you want to change?
Thanks both, much appreciated.
Scott's clearly right. I changed to a widescreen LCD monitor some
months ago. So I'm now typically using a resolution of 1920 x 1200.
I'm seeing what I called the 'correct' page like this
http://www.terrypin.dial.pipex.com/Images/2003-1920x1200.jpg
and the other, 'incorrect' ones like this
http://www.terrypin.dial.pipex.com/Images/2004etc1920x1200.jpg
I'm pretty sure I checked out the appearance (in IE and Firefox, and
at that time I think also Netscape) at 640 x 480, 800 x 600 and 1024 x
768. The latter was my previous monitor resolution). They looked
acceptable then I think (with main aim to avoid horizontal scrolling).
Makes me realise what a tough job it must be to design pages that are
going to look 'good' across the range of today's monitor sizes.
I'll try your suggestion Scott, but suspect I'm going to have to make
a major project of it!

Signature
Terry, East Grinstead, UK
Chris F.A. Johnson - 28 Aug 2008 19:40 GMT
...
> Makes me realise what a tough job it must be to design pages that are
> going to look 'good' across the range of today's monitor sizes.
It takes more work to prevent pages behaving properly in all
situations. By default, pages adjust to the browser window.
Don't stop the browser doing its job and you will have no problems.

Signature
Chris F.A. Johnson <http://cfaj.freeshell.org>
===================================================================
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)
> I've just taken a look at some web pages I created several years ago,
> since when I've forgotten most of what little I knew about HTML
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> there's some relatively trivial explanation and fix. Otherwise I have
> a lot of re-learning to do before I can isolate it
Given what the HTML looks like, I'd recommend the re-learning, but...
I suspect that what changed since you built those pages is your monitor.
In the past your browser window was narrow enough to force everything to
line up down the page. Alignment problems showed up when your browser
window was wide enough to allow portions of the page to shift position.
If you are looking for a kludgy quick fix, the page you don't like has
the photos inside a div with the align attribute set to 'center'. There
is also a center tag below that. Remove these, and their corresponding
end tags, and you MIGHT see what you want to see. The code is messy
enough that I can't tell for sure.