Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneralPHPASPPerlColdFusionFlashHTML, CSS, ScriptsBrowsers

Webmaster Forum / HTML, CSS, Scripts / CSS / August 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Tag Cloud

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
shapper - 24 Aug 2008 23:57 GMT
Hello,

What is the correct markup and CSS styles to create a Tag Cloud?

Should I place each tag inside a list item of an ordered list and
style the list item with a different CSS class according to the tag
frequency to change its size and color?

Does anyone knows a good article on this?

Thanks,
Miguel
Joost Diepenmaat - 25 Aug 2008 00:10 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> style the list item with a different CSS class according to the tag
> frequency to change its size and color?

If you have a real ordering of relevance/frequency/whatever the best
way to markup the list is probably to use an ordered list. It seems to
me that you've thought this through better than most people would. In
any case, HTML is very limited, and I don't think you will find any
markup that would be objectively better, just because there is no way
to objectively markup relevance, frequencey or whatever.

> Does anyone knows a good article on this?

I don't. But that's just a single data point.

Signature

Joost Diepenmaat | blog: http://joost.zeekat.nl/ | work: http://zeekat.nl/

Nik Coughlin - 25 Aug 2008 01:40 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> style the list item with a different CSS class according to the tag
> frequency to change its size and color?

Yes

> Does anyone knows a good article on this?

http://24ways.org/2006/marking-up-a-tag-cloud
Roderik - 27 Aug 2008 01:22 GMT
Nik Coughlin schreef:
>> Hello,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> http://24ways.org/2006/marking-up-a-tag-cloud

My 2 cents for the Technorati solution. I think embedding <em>s makes
sense even though the author criticises it. Putting emphasis on
something that has emphasis can be done perfectly. And the argument
about <strong> makes sense in such a way that there is no need for a
<strong> element. Even nicer would have been an optional parameter
stating the amount of emphasis. Like <em strength="5"> (with a default
of 1 maybe). But as long that is not part of the HTML standard I would
stay with embedding them.

Signature

http://www.archytas.nl/
webdesign, internet applicaties, internetgestuurde elektronica

Jonathan N. Little - 27 Aug 2008 15:56 GMT
> Nik Coughlin schreef:
>>> Hello,
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> of 1 maybe). But as long that is not part of the HTML standard I would
> stay with embedding them.

Not too familiar with tag clouds, but if you want link characteristics
sized link to some popularity that is a styling issue. This "strength"
attribute regressive back to presentational HTML.

Better:

a.whisper {
 font-size: .8em;
 volume: soft; /* if you want the effect for the blind */
}

a.announce {
 font-size: 1em;
 volume: medium; /* if you want the effect for the blind */
}

a.shout {
 font-size: 1.5em;
 volume: loud; /* if you want the effect for the blind */
}

a.bellow{
 font-size: 2.5em;
 font-weight: bolder;
 volume: x-loud; /* if you want the effect for the blind */
 pitch-range: low;
}

a.screech{
 font-size: 1.5em;
 font-style: italic;
 volume: loud; /* if you want the effect for the blind */
 pitch-range: high;
}

Signature

Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.