> Dorayme,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> for most thumnails have the same width, and I'll deal with the
> exceptions on an an ad hoc basis.
You are welcome. It would be useful if you quoted the bits that you are
replying to before your comments. For example, I am wondering what my
demo link was and maybe I can make an improvement for you. Not all of us
have newsreaders that store threads. Mine is an online reader and
forgets everything read (unless especially saved and even then it is not
great for reasons I will not bore you with!). So, here is a self
interest argument to be following normal ng rules. <g>
Nevertheless, let me see in my browser histories where it is and see if
we can do something about you not having to set a left margin to
accommodate different width pics. Ah yes...
A couple of suggestions, set the css left margin of the description
paragraphs for the widest pic you have rather than having to attend to
each. This will have the advantage of table like regularity. But as you
please.
Talking of tables, is there any particular reason not to use a two col
table and let the in-built technology of tables do the alignment work
for you? It is certainly tabular in nature what you are wanting (as, I
recently noticed, John H was urging).

Signature
dorayme
Haines Brown - 27 May 2008 13:42 GMT
>> Dorayme,
> Talking of tables, is there any particular reason not to use a two col
> table and let the in-built technology of tables do the alignment work
> for you? It is certainly tabular in nature what you are wanting (as, I
> recently noticed, John H was urging).
The site I'm reconstructing was built in ca. 1997, and since then I lost
control over it. I recently recovered it and am rebuilding it without the
javascript menuing, which didn't work very well (and was a pain for me
to work with). But in redesigning it, I also decided to do away with the
original (non-CSS) tabular organization of the pages. I don't see the
page content as representing a table and try to avoid tables in
ambivalent situations like this. CSS seems to be doing the job for
me just fine.

Signature
Haines Brown, KB1GRM
dorayme - 28 May 2008 03:09 GMT
> >> Dorayme,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> ambivalent situations like this. CSS seems to be doing the job for
> me just fine.
Putting in a table in a page is not laying the page out in tables. And
it is certainly not a bad thing to do when you are dealing with material
that is appropriate to a table.
Your material is appropriate. There are pictures in one col and
corresponding descriptions, row by row, in the other.
Sure, it is fine to do what we discussed previously with floated things
and not use tables. But it is a misdescription to view this alternative
to tables as doing it with CSS. Doing it with tables is doing it with
CSS too (if you have CSS to style the table). Doing without tables is
often doing it 'with divs'

Signature
dorayme