> Guys (and girls if you are here)
>
> This group is one of the funniest I have read for a long while.
[...]
That's funny; usually we're accused of having no sense of humor.
> Great stuff, and I'm learning loads as well, although I'm slightly
> dismayed to read that there is a (admittedly fledgling) CSS3 spec out
> there,
Just don't hold your breath waiting.
Nick
--
Nick Theodorakis
nick_theodorakis@hotmail.com
contact form:
http://theodorakis.net/contact.html
> Great stuff, and I'm learning loads as well, although I'm slightly
> dismayed to read that there is a (admittedly fledgling) CSS3 spec out
> there, good grief, I've only just managed to read a third of the CSS2
> spec (and managed to understand considerably less I hasten to add),
> where will it all end ?
CSS2.1 is in the penultimate stage, so expect that to become CR within a
year and a REC in ~2-3 years (it needs "two compliant implementations";
I expect Opera will be one of them; toss up for Konqueror, Safari, and
FF for the other one). Under that time schedule, IE 11 should be fully
CSS2.1-compliant.
When will it end? When someone figures out a way to precisely specify a
page so that it is readable and looks the same on:
@ A PDA
@ Your cell phone
@ A monitor, from 640x480 resolution to whatever you can imagine
@ Printer paper including A4, Letter, Legal, and plotter paper
@ A 53-inch plasma-screen TV
@ A projector
I give it until the end of HTML.

Signature
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
Jonathan N. Little - 31 Aug 2007 15:14 GMT
> CSS2.1 is in the penultimate stage, so expect that to become CR within a
> year and a REC in ~2-3 years (it needs "two compliant implementations";
> I expect Opera will be one of them; toss up for Konqueror, Safari, and
> FF for the other one). Under that time schedule, IE 11 should be fully
> CSS2.1-compliant.
IE11 eh? You think Redmond will give in that easily?

Signature
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Joshua Cranmer - 31 Aug 2007 15:25 GMT
>> CSS2.1 is in the penultimate stage, so expect that to become CR within
>> a year and a REC in ~2-3 years (it needs "two compliant
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> IE11 eh? You think Redmond will give in that easily?
You're underestimating my underestimation of them.
IE 11 expected ship date: 2038.
First problem: It thinks that it's 1902.

Signature
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
Jonathan N. Little - 31 Aug 2007 16:04 GMT
>>> CSS2.1 is in the penultimate stage, so expect that to become CR
>>> within a year and a REC in ~2-3 years (it needs "two compliant
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> IE 11 expected ship date: 2038.
But the actual release date 2045 with SP1 to make it work released on 2046!
> First problem: It thinks that it's 1902.
Sure in MS-Years...

Signature
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Joshua Cranmer - 31 Aug 2007 17:56 GMT
>> IE 11 expected ship date: 2038.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Sure in MS-Years...
Er, mis-calculated slightly. It might 1901 if they do it early enough
(late January).
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_Problem for why...

Signature
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth