Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneralPHPASPPerlColdFusionFlashHTML, CSS, ScriptsBrowsers

Webmaster Forum / HTML, CSS, Scripts / CSS / June 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

CSS Definition works in Firefox but fails on refresh in IE

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Prince of Code - 27 Jun 2007 13:13 GMT
Hi all,

Following is a style that i am using. It works well in Firefox. In IE
during the first page load is works fine. when there is a AJAX Refresh
in some of the DIV (which is not related to this), It changes its
color to white so it becomes invisible.

What is the issue here ? fixes, suggestions welcome with Thanks

FYI: The behaviour of the style is Green box with White text.
.colorOne .header h3
{
color:#fff;
border:solid 1px #b7dc94;
background:url(http://o.aolcdn.com/art/ch_cooking/tf-sprite-map)
repeat-x 0 -60px;
}

Thanks
~ Prince ~
rf - 27 Jun 2007 13:28 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> repeat-x 0 -60px;
> }

Could you provide any LESS information on your problem?

[google groups. Figures].
Prince of Code - 27 Jun 2007 13:59 GMT
> > Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> [google groups. Figures].

What is the question that you are trying to raise :)

~ P ~
Jonathan N. Little - 27 Jun 2007 14:52 GMT
>>> Hi all,
>>> Following is a style that i am using. It works well in Firefox. In IE
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> What is the question that you are trying to raise :)

A bit to subtle, eh? He is asking for a URL so we may actually *see*
what you are doing and maybe able to offer some advice...

Signature

Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

rf - 27 Jun 2007 14:54 GMT
>> > .h3
>> > {
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> What is the question that you are trying to raise :)

<sigh/>

I am not trying to raise any question at all. You are, and your question is
incomplete.

You give us a little tiny bit of CSS and expect us to explain why it does
not work with the rest of your CSS, whatever unknown HTML you may be
applying that CSS to and what ever CSS and/or HTML errors you may have. It
may be something else entirely.

Do you expect your car mechanic to give you a full and complete answer when
you tell him: "My car started yesterday, it didn't start today. Here is a
picture of its headlight. What is wrong?"?

At the least provide us with a URL to the offending page, after you have
validated both the HTML and  the CSS.

I repeat:
[google groups. Figures].

This is not google. It is a newsgroup.

Signature

Richard.

Prince of Code - 27 Jun 2007 17:14 GMT
Every time a question cannot have url. It is unlikely to disclose a
proprietary code. The question though it doesn't have a URL it has
enough information to give some kind of suggestion or some clue. Which
is all my expectation and which would be greatly appreciated.
Deviating from Technical discussion to something else doesn't look
good.

Thanks
~ P ~

> "Prince of Code" <princeofc...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1182949156.292420.100790@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> --
> Richard.
John Hosking - 27 Jun 2007 17:39 GMT
We beg thee, oh Prince, not to top-post.

> Every time a question cannot have url.

A question without a URL is like a question without an answer, or a
poster without readers.

> The question though it doesn't have a URL it has
> enough information to give some kind of suggestion or some clue.

No, not really. In fact, there is a remarkable scarcity of clue.

Signature

John
Pondering the value of the UIP: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

Bergamot - 27 Jun 2007 18:40 GMT
> Every time a question cannot have url. It is unlikely to disclose a
> proprietary code.

The accepted practice in this newsgroup is to provide a URL to a page
showing the situation. Your thoughts about this practice aren't really
relevant.

If you want assistance, make it easy for people to help you. A URL is
the way. Posting a code snippet with a vague description of the problem
is not. If your site isn't publicly available, make a test page that is,
and validate the code before posting. Note that by doing this, you may
find your own answer.

> The question though it doesn't have a URL it has
> enough information to give some kind of suggestion or some clue.

This is your opinion. That doesn't make it true.

> Deviating from Technical discussion to something else doesn't look
> good.

This is a Usenet discussion group, not a google help desk forum. We are
free to discuss your query any way we like. Just as you are free to
ignore posts you think are irrelevant to your query.

And don't top post.
http://allmyfaqs.net/faq.pl?How_to_post

Signature

Berg

rf - 28 Jun 2007 00:38 GMT
> Every time a question cannot have url.

URL -> help. No URL -> no help. Your choice.

--
Richard.
Ben C - 28 Jun 2007 08:54 GMT
>> Every time a question cannot have url.
>
> URL -> help. No URL -> no help. Your choice.

It's more like URL <- help, No URL -> no help.
Chris F.A. Johnson - 28 Jun 2007 01:29 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> repeat-x 0 -60px;
> }

   That style will be applied to an H3 element inside an element with
   class="header" which is inside another element with
   class="colorOne".

   Is that what you want?

   If it is, then provide a URL to a page reduced to the simplest
   code that displays the problem,.

Signature

  Chris F.A. Johnson                      <http://cfaj.freeshell.org>
  ========= Do not reply to the From: address; use Reply-To: ========
  Author:
  Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.