>>>I can not figure out how to do it.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> finecur should consider itself very, very lucky.
Scripsit Ben C:
> Actually I have no problem with finecur, since the problem was not
> difficult to understand as posted.
You didn't get upset with pointless repetitive postings that indicated
little understanding of the answers so far? (Just a rhetoric question.)
> The "post a url to a test page that validates" rule is a good one in
> general, but if it's clear what the problem is in a few lines of
> markup then why not?
Because there is too little information to know what the problem really was.
We have no explanation for the apparently pointless colspan, for example.
Your proposed a solution that you admitted to be dodgy and declared as
working some browsers, which exclude IE, i.e. most browsing situations. What
possible problem would justify such a solution?

Signature
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Ben C - 22 Feb 2007 13:35 GMT
> Scripsit Ben C:
[...]
>> The "post a url to a test page that validates" rule is a good one in
>> general, but if it's clear what the problem is in a few lines of
>> markup then why not?
>
> Because there is too little information to know what the problem really was.
> We have no explanation for the apparently pointless colspan, for example.
True, the colspan is a puzzle. But the English explanation was clear
enough to me:
finecur> The width of the second row (and thus the width of the table)
finecur> is changing depending on its content. I want, however, in the
finecur> first row, "Name" is always left aligned. The button is always
finecur> right aligned. And the text filed fill all the space between
finecur> them.
> Your proposed a solution that you admitted to be dodgy and declared as
> working some browsers, which exclude IE, i.e. most browsing situations. What
> possible problem would justify such a solution?
An interesting problem, which I tried to characterize and presented a
dodgy solution to in the hope that someone would be able to improve on
it.
dorayme - 22 Feb 2007 22:09 GMT
> Scripsit Ben C:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> You didn't get upset with pointless repetitive postings that indicated
> little understanding of the answers so far? (Just a rhetoric question.)
It is quite noticeable and admirable in a
'beyond-the-call-of-duty' sort of a way, how tolerant Ben C is
about these things! Perhaps he had an unusually happy childhood.

Signature
dorayme
> The "post a url to a test page that validates" rule is a good one in
> general, but if it's clear what the problem is in a few lines of markup
> then why not?
The key phase here being "if", of course... :)

Signature
dorayme