> The access example provided from link fails. 2 part SQL doesn't work
> ??
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> sql = "INSERT someTable(IntColumn) values(" & fakeValue & ")" & _
> VBCrLf & " SELECT @@IDENTITY"

Signature
Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.
>> The access example provided from link fails. 2 part SQL doesn't work
>> ??
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> course, he (Aaron) doesn't own the site anymore. Perhaps you could
> report this to the current site owners ... ?
I don't think the site is being maintained anymore. One of the articles on
it includes a script to generate test data, that reportedly takes 7 minutes
to run. I submitted a revision that generates 28% more test rows, with
identical distribution, in under 15 seconds.
Usually, improving the performance of some op by almost a factor of 30 is
pretty attractive, from a programmer's perspective. :-) I guess I must
assume that the new owners of the site are not actually programmers?
-Mark
Jon Paal [MSMD] - 07 Sep 2007 15:25 GMT
if they had allowed addition of user comments, or put the database into a wiki style format, it would continue to improve. As it is
now, the locked structure is too much to maintain.
> I don't think the site is being maintained anymore. One of the articles on it includes a script to generate test data, that
> reportedly takes 7 minutes to run. I submitted a revision that generates 28% more test rows, with identical distribution, in
> under 15 seconds.
>
> Usually, improving the performance of some op by almost a factor of 30 is pretty attractive, from a programmer's perspective. :-)
> I guess I must assume that the new owners of the site are not actually programmers?